Social Democrats
Short answer: The Social Democrats say that the party is based on democratic socialism, with freedom, equality and solidarity as basic concepts. The party became the largest party in the Riksdag election 2026 with 28.02 percent and 99 seats. Party leader Magdalena Andersson was voted down as prime minister on 15 October 2026.
- Founded
- April 1889, as the Swedish Social Democratic Workers' Party (the party's history)
- Party leader
- Magdalena Andersson, since 2021 (riksdagen.se).
- Riksdag election 2026
- 28.02 percent and 99 of 349 seats, a decrease of 8 seats (Election Authority).
- Ideology in its own words
- "Social democracy wants to shape an equal society founded on the equal worth of all people" (party programme 2025).
- After the election
- In opposition. The Riksdag voted down Magdalena Andersson as prime minister on 15 October 2026 (the Riksdag). On 27 October 2026 the question of the government had not been settled.
Where the party comes from and how voters have voted.
The Social Democrats were founded in 1889 at a congress in Stockholm, out of the labour movement. The party sat in government for the first time in 1917, and Hjalmar Branting formed the first Social Democratic government in 1920. From 1932 the party governed for 44 years in a row, with a short interruption in 1936, with Per Albin Hansson, Tage Erlander and Olof Palme as prime ministers. During that time the Swedish welfare state was built out.
The party returned to power in 1982 and then governed 1982 to 1991, 1994 to 2006 and 2014 to 2022, with the prime ministers Palme, Ingvar Carlsson, Göran Persson, Stefan Löfven and Magdalena Andersson, who became Sweden's first female prime minister in 2021. The party has been the largest party in every Riksdag election since 1973, but its share has fallen from 45.6 percent in 1982 to around 30 percent. The congress in 2025 adopted a new party programme.
The Social Democrats' share of the vote in Riksdag elections
| Election year | Percent | Election year | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 45.3 | 1998 | 36.4 |
| 1973 | 43.6 | 2002 | 39.9 |
| 1976 | 42.7 | 2006 | 35.0 |
| 1979 | 43.2 | 2010 | 30.7 |
| 1982 | 45.6 | 2014 | 31.0 |
| 1985 | 44.7 | 2018 | 28.3 |
| 1988 | 43.2 | 2022 | 30.3 |
| 1991 | 37.7 | 2026 | 28.0 |
| 1994 | 45.3 |
Sources: Statistics Sweden, historical election statistics 1910 to 2022, and the Election Authority for the 2026 election. Share of valid votes.
What the party says it wants.
The party programme from 2025 describes democratic socialism with the concepts of freedom, equality and solidarity, and writes that "equality a precondition for freedom". On the economy, the programme says that "Full employment is the overarching goal of Social Democratic economic policy."
The 2026 election platform is called "Dags att ta Sverige på allvar". There the party writes that "Sweden is to become richer" and that "Hard work should pay off." On schools, the platform says that "All schools are to focus on pupils' knowledge and development, not on chasing profit." and on elderly care that "It should be secure to grow old in Sweden."
Seven issues, the same for every party.
Economy and taxes
The Social Democrats want to introduce a temporary tax on the part of the big banks' net interest income that exceeds the historical average and return the money to households and welfare. In the budget motion for 2026 the party estimates the tax at 12.6 billion kronor. The party supports the government's earned income tax credit for incomes up to 66,750 kronor a month but wants to reintroduce the phase-out for higher incomes. It also wants to introduce a third tax level for large holdings in investment savings accounts and says no to a property tax.
The party wants to raise the child allowance by 200 kronor per child and month and temporarily lower the VAT on food to 6 percent. A programme against waste of tax money, including a ban on profits in schools and measures against criminal economy, is according to the party to free up 75 to 95 billion kronor a year over two terms of office. Financing according to the budget motion for 2026: 32.4 billion kronor more in revenue than the government's proposal, against 27.2 billion kronor more in spending.
- The Social Democrats' budget motion for 2026, motion 2025/26:3551
- The Social Democrats, taxes
- The Social Democrats, on the waste of tax money
Work
The Social Democrats want to remove the sick-pay qualifying deduction and introduce a high-cost protection for sick pay in small and medium-sized companies, for 500 million kronor. The party wants to raise the ceiling in unemployment insurance and remove the steeper phase-down. Young unemployed people are to get a job contract with work, education or a traineeship within 90 days. The party wants to multiply the number of labour market training places in shortage occupations and reintroduce extra jobs. Those who receive social assistance are to follow assigned measures in a "job ladder", and the Public Employment Service is to be present in more places. The party also wants to introduce a needs-tested pension for those who cannot work until retirement age.
- The Social Democrats, election platform 2026
- The Social Democrats, jobs and the labour market
- The Social Democrats' budget motion for 2026
Crime and punishment
The Social Democrats want to introduce a Swedish mafia law and let the state take criminals' property and use it in vulnerable areas. The Swedish Economic Crime Authority is to become an authority against organised crime. The party wants to abolish the sentence discount for multiple crimes, starting with sexual offences, and tighten the penalties for recruiting children to crime, for serious economic crimes and for gross violation of a woman's integrity. The supervision period after prison for men who have committed violence against women and children is to be doubled.
The party also wants to put more resources into preventing crime, with a national programme for families at risk and 1.7 billion kronor for social services in the budget motion. Against crime in working life the party proposes 10,000 more workplace inspections a year and at most two tiers of subcontractors in vulnerable sectors.
Migration and integration
The Social Democrats say that the strict migration policy is to remain, in line with the EU's minimum levels, and want to increase returns for those who have been refused. The party says no to deportations of children and young people who have put down roots in Sweden and to revoking permanent residence permits already granted. Labour immigration is to be tested against the labour market's needs again, designed together with the social partners. The party wants to reform Swedish for immigrants (SFI), set requirements for knowledge of Swedish and civics for a permanent residence permit and language requirements for staff in preschool and elderly care. Asylum seekers' own accommodation is to be abolished and replaced by state accommodation.
- The Social Democrats, election platform 2026
- The Social Democrats, immigration and integration
- The Social Democrats, migration and refugee policy
Climate and energy
The Social Democrats want an energy agreement across the bloc divide for more electricity from all fossil-free forms of power, both nuclear power and offshore wind power. Municipalities that build onshore wind power are to get stronger compensation, and the budget motion sets aside 100 million kronor for a bonus for fast wind power decisions. The party wants to reintroduce green credits for industry, expand the Industrial Leap (Industriklivet) and the Climate Leap (Klimatklivet) and broaden support for electric cars. Electricity grid fees are to be regulated anew and the state to take greater control of the congestion revenues. Young people are to be able to travel free of charge on public transport in the evenings, at weekends and during holidays, for 750 million kronor.
Health and social care
The Social Democrats want 80 percent of the population to have a regular doctor contact as a first step. The party wants a national digital doctor service in 1177 without a profit motive and national care contracts with the regions against the queues, and the budget motion sets aside 2.4 billion kronor for staff against care queues. People with private insurance are not to get priority with care providers that receive public money. In elderly care the party wants an elderly care act and a dignity guarantee and to abolish minute-by-minute control. Dental care is to be free of charge again for ages 19 to 23, for 576 million kronor, and medicines are to become cheaper, for 2.2 billion.
- The Social Democrats, election platform 2026
- The Social Democrats, care according to need
- The Social Democrats' budget motion for 2026
School
The Social Democrats want to ban profits in school and preschool and stop new profit-making operators. There is to be a joint school choice without separate queues for independent schools, and no new religious independent schools. The party wants to introduce binding rules of at most 12 pupils per teacher in the lower years and finance it with money that today goes to the independent school groups. The party wants to ban mobile phones in school and introduce daily reading for younger children. In the budget motion the party sets aside 3.7 billion kronor for schools, which according to the party corresponds to around 5,500 teachers.
The agencies' assessments, question by question.
This section sets out what government agencies and state councils have said about the party's proposals or about the same type of proposal, in the agency's own words or a close summary, both when they support and when they oppose. Parties that have been in government often receive more consultation responses, because their proposals have become inquiries and government bills, so a difference in quantity is not a judgement.
Economy and taxes
We have not found any statement by a public authority on a temporary tax on banks' net interest income. The Social Democrats want to cut VAT on food temporarily to 6 percent, the same measure the government introduced from 1 April 2026. In its consultation response, the National Institute of Economic Research (KI) judged that it can strengthen household finances but that the stimulus effect is limited, and saw a considerable risk that it becomes permanent. The Swedish National Financial Management Authority (ESV) advised against the proposal and judged that targeted support would have been more efficient, and the Fiscal Policy Council writes that the cut increases distortions in the tax system.
- National Institute of Economic Research, consultation response on Temporarily reduced VAT on food (Fi2025/01687), 30 September 2025
- Swedish National Financial Management Authority, consultation response on Temporarily reduced VAT on food (Fi2025/01687), 1 October 2025
- Swedish Fiscal Policy Council, Swedish Fiscal Policy 2026, 16 February 2026
Work
On the qualifying deduction for sick pay (karensavdrag), the Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate wrote in 2025 that the deduction can reduce short-term absence but may contribute to longer absence among those who are on sick leave, and that the empirical evidence is limited. IFAU found in 2016 that the job guarantee for young people got unemployed young people into work somewhat faster, but that much of the effect came before they started the programme and that there were no long-term effects. The Public Employment Service's 2024 evaluation of extra jobs (extratjänster) showed generally small effects, mainly a move into other subsidised jobs, and a negative effect on unsubsidised work for all groups except newly arrived women. On the tapering of unemployment benefit, IFAU took no position in 2020, but advised against leaving the benefit ceiling unindexed.
- Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate, Report 2025:13, The importance of social insurance for individuals and society, section 3.3.2, 2025
- IFAU, Shorter unemployment spells with the job guarantee for young people, Working Paper 2016:15, 4 October 2016
- Public Employment Service, Arbetsförmedlingen analys 2024:5, An impact evaluation of extra jobs, 31 October 2024
- IFAU, consultation response on SOU 2020:37 A new set of rules for unemployment insurance, 30 October 2020
Crime and punishment
On the type of proposal for a law against participation in criminal associations, such as the party's anti-mafia law: in May 2026 the Swedish Prosecution Authority supported and the Swedish Police Authority was positive to criminal liability for participation in and association with criminal associations, while Brå advised against it and wrote that the definition is very broad. On abolishing the volume discount for multiple offences: on 25 June 2026 the Council on Legislation advised against the government's proposal on how the sentence should be determined for multiple offences, because it does not provide sufficient grounds for uniform application of the law, while the Swedish Prosecution Authority had earlier supported a stricter penalty scale for multiple offences. On tougher penalties for recruiting children: on 1 September 2026 Brå advised against the memorandum on an aggravated offence of involving minors and wanted the provision to be evaluated first, while the Swedish Police Authority was positive. We have not found any statement by a public authority on the party's proposals for longer supervision after prison or more workplace inspections.
- Swedish Prosecution Authority, consultation response on SOU 2026:13 (participation in criminal associations), 4 May 2026
- Swedish Police Authority, consultation response on SOU 2026:13, 5 May 2026
- Brå, consultation response on SOU 2026:13, 18 May 2026
- Council on Legislation, opinion on A new criminal sanctions system, 25 June 2026
- Swedish Prosecution Authority, consultation response on SOU 2025:66 A penal reform, 7 October 2025
- Brå, consultation response on Ds 2026:14 (involvement of minors in crime), 1 September 2026
- Swedish Police Authority, consultation response on Ds 2026:14, 31 August 2026
Migration and integration
On the proposal to change permanent residence permits already granted, which the party opposes, the Swedish Migration Agency wrote on 19 December 2025 that strong reasons are needed to change such a decision and that the reform would mean an enormous increase in cases and costs running into billions of kronor. On the type of proposal requiring knowledge of Swedish and civics, the Swedish National Agency for Education took no position on 13 April 2021 on the requirement itself for citizenship, but advised against the agency being responsible for the tests and considered the timetable unrealistic. We have not found any agency statement on a labour market test or on abolishing asylum seekers' own arranged housing.
- Swedish Migration Agency, consultation response on SOU 2025:99 Changing permanent residence permits for certain foreign nationals, 19 December 2025
- Swedish National Agency for Education, opinion on SOU 2021:2, 13 April 2021
Climate and energy
In its report of 19 March 2026 the Swedish Climate Policy Council recommends a broad and long-term energy agreement in the Riksdag. The Council considers that state green credit guarantees are one of the more cost-effective ways for the state to share risk in large investments and that they should be resumed, and that the Industry Leap and the Climate Leap should continue to be developed. The Council welcomes compensation to municipalities with wind power but considers that it should correspond to the property tax that the wind turbines generate. The statements concern the type of proposal.
Health and social care
On a named regular doctor: Vårdanalys reported on 31 March 2026 that the share who say they have a regular doctor rose from 26 per cent in 2024 to 31 per cent in 2025, while nearly six in ten say they need one. The agency writes that access varies between regions and links this to a shortage of doctors in primary care. On an elderly care act (the type of proposal in SOU 2022:41): Socialstyrelsen supported a separate act on elderly care, while Vårdanalys opposed it and wrote that the draft is hard to read and partly duplicates the Social Services Act. On free dental care for young adults: in report 2021:4 the Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate (ISF) found that the share visiting dental care each year rose by 25.5 percentage points when the age limit was raised, most among those with poorer dental health or low household income. ISF also writes that it cannot determine how much of this is due to the care being free.
- Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis (Vårdanalys), En fast punkt? (interim report), 31 March 2026
- Socialstyrelsen, consultation response on Nästa steg (SOU 2022:41), 8 November 2022
- Vårdanalys, consultation response on Nästa steg (SOU 2022:41), 10 November 2022
- Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate (ISF), Avgiftsfri tandvård till unga vuxna, report 2021:4
School
On the proposal type, restricting profits, the Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket) supports a time-limited ban on value transfers in independent schools (SOU 2025:37, response of 25 June 2025), but judges that it would probably stop new independent schools from being established; the proposal is narrower than a general ban on profits. On a common school choice, Skolverket, in its response of 11 November 2020 to SOU 2020:28, supports a common school choice system and judges that it could be a step towards less school segregation, and shares the view that selection by queuing time has negative effects. The Swedish Schools Inspectorate (Skolinspektionen), however, needs more analysis before it can take a position on a common school choice system. On a national mobile phone ban, Skolverket, in its response of 18 June 2025, takes no position on whether the ban should be introduced and writes that there is no clear scientific support for the possible positive effects.
- Skolverket, consultation response on SOU 2025:37 Stricter conditions for the independent school sector, 25 June 2025, ref. 2025:1342
- Skolverket, consultation response on SOU 2020:28 A more equitable school, 11 November 2020
- Swedish Schools Inspectorate, consultation response on SOU 2020:28 A more equitable school, 30 November 2020, ref. 2020:5122
- Skolverket, consultation response on Ds 2025:9 A national mobile phone ban in compulsory school and school-age educare, 18 June 2025, ref. 2025:2172
The research on the issues, with no verdict on the party.
Here are six questions about proposals the Social Democrats highlight, phrased as questions about the issue and not about the party. The answers describe what research has found, in both directions, and where researchers disagree. They say nothing about how a particular proposal would work today.
-
Do independent schools affect learning outcomes and grades?
A Swedish study finds that municipalities where the share of pupils in independent schools grew quickly got somewhat better results on average, mainly through competition, but the effects are small and only appear after around ten years. Another study finds that upper-secondary pupils in independent schools performed slightly worse on externally marked tests and got more generous grades than pupils in municipal schools. Researchers disagree about the net effect on learning outcomes. There is hardly any research that directly evaluates a ban on profits.
Böhlmark and Lindahl (2015), Independent Schools and Long-run Educational Outcomes, Economica 82. Tyrefors Hinnerich and Vlachos (2017), The impact of upper-secondary voucher school attendance on student achievement, Labour Economics 47.
-
Do fewer pupils per teacher give better results?
In the STAR experiment in Tennessee, where pupils were randomly assigned to classes of different sizes, pupils in small classes were ahead after the first year, and the effect was largest for pupils from low-income families. A Swedish study finds that smaller classes at ages 10 to 13 led to longer education and higher pay in adulthood. Other researchers argue that the effects are small relative to the cost and that teacher quality matters more. The effect also depends on whether qualified teachers are available, and pupils per teacher is not the same measure as class size.
Krueger (1999), Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2). Fredriksson, Öckert and Oosterbeek (2013), Long-Term Effects of Class Size, Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(1).
-
Does sick leave rise if the sick-pay qualifying deduction is removed?
Theory says that a qualifying period reduces short sick spells, because absence costs the employee more. When the qualifying day was abolished in Sweden in 1987, the total number of sick days nevertheless fell, and the researchers explain this by fewer short sick spells becoming long ones. We have not found any evaluation of the qualifying deduction introduced in 2019, so the state of research is thinner than the debate.
Pettersson-Lidbom and Skogman Thoursie (2013), Temporary Disability Insurance and Labor Supply: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115(2).
-
Do harsher penalties reduce crime?
Reviews of the research conclude that the risk of being caught deters more than the length of the sentence, and that longer sentences that are already long have little deterrent effect. A study of an Italian amnesty in 2006, however, finds that a longer expected sentence for a new crime reduced reoffending. Longer sentences also prevent those inside from committing crimes outside, an effect that many researchers see as real but expensive. The research on gang crime specifically and on laws against organised crime is limited.
Nagin (2013), Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century, Crime and Justice 42(1). Drago, Galbiati and Vertova (2009), The Deterrent Effects of Prison: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, Journal of Political Economy 117(2).
-
Do more labour market training places get more unemployed people into jobs?
A meta-analysis of more than 200 evaluations finds that labour market programmes have effects close to zero in the short run but more positive effects two to three years later, and that training gives the largest gains in the long run. Swedish research shows that labour market training gave higher incomes three years after the start during the years 1996 to 2010, but that the effect varied between the years. In the 1990s, when the programmes were very large, the effects were weak. Researchers disagree about whether the effects hold when the number of places is multiplied.
Card, Kluve and Weber (2018), What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations, Journal of the European Economic Association 16(3). Vikström and van den Berg (2017), Long-term effects of labour market training, IFAU report 2017:17.
-
Does a regular doctor contact give better health?
A systematic review found 22 studies from nine countries, and 18 of them showed lower mortality when the patient saw the same doctor. Three found no association and one gave mixed results. All the studies are observational, so it is hard to separate cause from association, and they measured continuity in such different ways that the results could not be weighed together. How a national target for a regular doctor contact affects waiting times and doctors' workload is less studied.
Pereira Gray et al. (2018), Continuity of care with doctors: a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality, BMJ Open 8(6).
The issues on our theme pages.
- State budget: taxes, spending and the national debt.
- Work: employment and unemployment by municipality.
- The safety net: unemployment insurance, sickness insurance and child allowance.
- Crime: reported crimes, lethal violence and prevention.
- Population: immigration and emigration over time.
- Climate and energy: emissions and electricity production over time.
- The electricity price: what determines the price and who decides.
- Healthcare: waiting times and costs.
- Schools: results and grades by municipality.
The page reports what the Social Democrats themselves write in their party programme, their election platform and their budget motion, retrieved 27 October 2026. The research section describes the research on the issues, not the party.