How long do people wait for care, and how good is it?
Short answer: 85 per cent of those referred got their first visit within the care guarantee's 90 days in 2024, and the share has fallen since 2021. Only 47 per cent of cancer patients in standardised care pathways met the lead time in 2025. The care itself has improved: treatable mortality has fallen from 64 to 45 per 100,000 inhabitants since 2010, and avoidable hospital care has dropped by a third since 2008. Sweden has the fewest hospital beds per inhabitant in the EU, and overcrowding has increased.
The care guarantee, primary care, child psychiatry and cancer.
How waiting times for child and adolescent psychiatry and young people's mental health have developed is on Mental health.
Avoidable care, treatable mortality, heart attack and stroke.
Fewer beds and more overcrowding.
Places in residential care for older people are on Elderly care, and municipal LSS support and the state assistance allowance on Disability support (LSS).
What healthcare costs and who works there.
Sweden compared with the EU, Norway and Iceland.
Good care, long queues and few hospital beds.
Swedish healthcare delivers good results once you get it. Mortality from conditions that healthcare can treat is close to Norway and Iceland and lower than in Denmark and Finland. The weak point is access. Only 32 percent of Swedes say they have a regular doctor at their health centre, far below the average of the ten countries in the international comparison IHP 2023, and fewer than average get an appointment within two days or an operation within two months.
Sweden spends a larger share of GDP on healthcare than its neighbours but has the fewest hospital beds in the Nordics. In 2024, about four in ten of those waiting for an operation had waited longer than the care guarantee's 90 days. According to the government, queues have shrunk since 2022, but in July 2025 the statistics moved from SKR to the National Board of Health and Welfare, so the figures cannot be compared directly with earlier years.
Research points to the same things patients complain about: seeing the same doctor, wards that are not overcrowded and enough nurses. Money aimed directly at the queues has had a short-lived effect.
Healthcare in the Nordic countries
| Country | Health spending, share of GDP 2024 | Hospital beds per 1,000 inhabitants 2024 | Doctors per 1,000 inhabitants 2024 | Mortality from conditions healthcare can treat, per 100,000 in 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 11.2 percent | 1.9 | 4.7 | 58 |
| Norway | 9.2 percent | 3.2 | 5.1 | 55 |
| Denmark | 9.6 percent | 2.3 | 4.7 | 66 |
| Finland | 10.7 percent | 2.5 | 3.6 | 68 |
| Iceland | 9.2 percent | 2.6 (2023) | 4.7 | 58 |
Sources: OECD (spending) and Eurostat (hospital beds, doctors and deaths before age 75 from conditions that can be treated by healthcare, age-standardised). Countries count hospital beds differently, and Norway's share of GDP swings with oil and gas revenue. Iceland's figure for doctors covers professionally active doctors, not only those treating patients.
-
Does it matter to have the same doctor?
It seems so. In Norway, people who had had the same GP for more than 15 years had about 25 percent lower risk of dying, 28 percent lower risk of acute hospital admission and 30 percent lower risk of using out-of-hours care than those who had had their GP for only one year. The longer the relationship, the larger the difference. This is an association in register data, not proven cause.
Sandvik, Hetlevik, Blinkenberg and Hunskaar (2022), British Journal of General Practice.
-
Are overcrowded hospitals dangerous?
Most evidence suggests so. In Danish medical wards from 1995 to 2012, mortality was about 9 percent higher when the ward was very full. The study shows an association, not necessarily the cause.
Madsen, Ladelund and Linneberg (2014), Health Affairs.
-
Does the number of nurses matter?
It seems so. In 300 hospitals in nine European countries, including Sweden, Norway and Finland, each additional patient per nurse was associated with a 7 percent higher risk of dying in hospital within 30 days of admission for common surgery. More nurses with a university degree were associated with lower risk.
Aiken et al. (2014), The Lancet.
-
Did patient choice reform improve care?
A little. Many new health centres opened and patients became somewhat more satisfied, but there was no clear effect on avoidable hospital admissions and no sign of lower quality. The Swedish National Audit Office found that new health centres more often opened in areas with lower care needs and that the extra visits in Skåne and Västra Götaland went mainly to patients with lower needs.
Dietrichson, Ellegård and Kjellsson (2020), Health Economics. Swedish National Audit Office, RiR 2014:22, government communication.
-
Does money for shorter queues help?
Only briefly. Waiting times fell in the first year of the queue billion and then stood still. The Swedish National Audit Office concludes that the care guarantee, the queue billion and standardised care pathways have in many ways not been effective at shortening queues, and that the care guarantee and the care pathways risk crowding out sicker patients.
Swedish National Audit Office (2023), I väntan på vård, RiR 2023:12, government communication 2023/24:48.
-
Why are queues long when care is good?
Sweden is below the average in the comparison on continuity, on getting an appointment quickly and on care in the evenings and at weekends. On the other hand, few Swedes go without care because of the cost, and digital services are widely used.
Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis (2024), Care from the population's perspective, IHP 2023.
-
Have online doctors eased the load on health centres?
Partly. Visits to the national online doctors grew from around 20,000 in 2016 to 2.3 million in 2020. Some replace physical visits, but some are new care, and they led to more follow-up visits in the short term. Among those who used them, many went from using little care to using a lot.
Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis (2022), Besök via nätet (Visits via the internet).
Where the figures come from.
- Source: Kolada. Waiting times, cancer pathways, quality, hospital beds, overcrowding and cost by region, originally from SKR, the National Board of Health and Welfare and the regions themselves.
- Our own processing of Kolada data: doctors and nurses per 1,000 inhabitants, the share dying after a heart attack, and Sweden's values for stroke, hospital beds and healthcare-associated infections in the years Kolada has no national figure.
- Eurostat, health statistics (CC BY 4.0): treatable mortality, hospital beds, practising doctors and nurses, and health expenditure in purchasing-power-adjusted euros. Only the EU, Norway and Iceland. Sweden's hospital beds before 1999 and doctors and nurses before 2008 also come from here.
- Measured nationally but not included here: time in the emergency department (median and 90th percentile) and how many people are waiting. They are published on vantetider.se, but we have not been able to establish the terms for republishing them. Patients' own ratings (the National Patient Survey) are missing for the same reason.
Nothing is estimated by us except the ratios under own processing. The same regional figures are map layers on the map and on every county page.