Green Party
Short answer: The Green Party (Miljöpartiet) says that the party is built on a green ideology with solidarity with nature, future generations and all the world's people. The party received 6.12 percent in the Riksdag election 2026 and 22 seats. It has two spokespersons instead of a party leader and has been in opposition since 2021.
- Founded
- 20 September 1981, with roots in the environmental movement (the party's history)
- Spokespersons
- Amanda Lind, since 2024 (riksdagen.se), and Daniel Helldén, since 2023 (riksdagen.se).
- Riksdag election 2026
- 6.12 percent and 22 of 349 seats, an increase of 4 seats (Election Authority).
- Ideology in its own words
- "Our green ideology starts from a holistic view and is based on solidarity" (party programme 2025).
- After the election
- In opposition. The party was part of the government with the Social Democrats from 2014 to 2021. On 15 October 2026 the party voted no when the Riksdag voted on Magdalena Andersson (S) as prime minister (the Riksdag). On 27 October 2026 the question of the government had not been settled.
Where the party comes from and how voters have voted.
The Green Party was founded in 1981 in Örebro. The background was the environmental and peace movements and the struggle over nuclear power around the 1980 referendum. From the start the party chose to be led by two spokespersons instead of a party leader.
In the 1988 election the party entered the Riksdag with 5.5 percent, the first new party there in seven decades. It dropped out in 1991 but came back in 1994 and has been in the Riksdag ever since. From 1998 the party cooperated with the Social Democratic governments, and after the 2014 election it formed a government together with the Social Democrats under Stefan Löfven. The party left the government in 2021 and has been in opposition since. In the 2026 election the party increased by one percentage point compared with 2022.
The Green Party's share of the vote in Riksdag elections
| Election year | Percent | Election year | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 5.5 | 2010 | 7.3 |
| 1991 | 3.4 | 2014 | 6.9 |
| 1994 | 5.0 | 2018 | 4.4 |
| 1998 | 4.5 | 2022 | 5.1 |
| 2002 | 4.6 | 2026 | 6.1 |
| 2006 | 5.2 |
Sources: Statistics Sweden, historical election statistics 1910 to 2022, and the Election Authority for the 2026 election. Share of valid votes. The party also stood in 1982 and 1985 but did not get in.
What the party says it wants.
The party programme from 2025 is based on three solidarities: with animals, nature and the ecological system, with future generations and with all the world's people. The party writes that "Our goal is a society where everyone can live good lives within the limits of nature" and that "the planet's boundaries are not negotiable". On working life, the programme says that "Shorter working hours are a freedom reform".
The 2026 election manifesto summarises the party's line as "With our policies we cut emissions, strengthen equality and protect nature." The party wants "those who emit the most should pay the most" and writes about electricity supply that "New nuclear power is not the solution".
Seven issues, the same for every party.
Economy and taxes
The Green Party wants to raise taxes on high incomes and large fortunes and use the money for climate and welfare. In its budget motion for 2026 the party proposes that the tax-free amount on investment savings accounts be 50,000 kronor instead of the government's 300,000, which according to the party yields 11.2 billion kronor. A temporary tax on the banks' net interest income is to yield 12.5 billion. The earned income tax credit is to be phased out for high incomes and a new bracket threshold introduced at 70,000 kronor a month, which the party estimates at 16.4 billion. The party says no to the government's latest earned income tax credit.
The party wants to raise the child allowance by 350 kronor a month, give extra support to single parents and halve VAT on repairs. It also wants to introduce a target for public investment alongside the balance target of the fiscal policy framework. Financing according to the budget motion for 2026: the tax increases above.
- The Green Party's budget motion for 2026, motion 2025/26:3770
- The Green Party, election manifesto 2026
Work
The Green Party wants to lower normal working hours step by step to 35 hours a week together with the social partners, with a four-day week as a vision. The party wants to abolish the sick-pay qualifying deduction and reduce employers' sick pay responsibility. Unemployment insurance is to be phased down by 5 instead of 10 percentage points after 100 days. In the budget motion the party sets aside 480 million kronor for labour market measures and education, 300 million for the Public Employment Service's local offices and 50 million for young people who neither work nor study.
Crime and punishment
The Green Party wants to put the emphasis on preventing crime. The party sets aside 1 billion kronor a year for measures for children at risk and 300 million for social services, and wants 500 million of the police appropriation to go to community police officers and civilian staff. The party wants to set up an authority against segregation and a programme for people who want to leave criminal gangs.
The party says that children should not be in prison and wants to reform the state youth homes and residential care homes (HVB), give young people the right to aftercare up to age 25 and introduce a crime victims act. It also wants to step up efforts against smuggling of weapons and explosives and on the gangs' crimes against the welfare systems, and to have high penalties for sexual offences.
Migration and integration
The Green Party wants Sweden to receive at least 5,000 quota refugees a year and permanent residence permits to become the main rule again. The party wants to reintroduce the ground "particularly distressing circumstances" and the possibility of changing track, stop deportations of people who have put down roots in Sweden and let children up to age 21 get residence permits as family members. The daily allowance for asylum seekers is to be raised from 71 to around 130 kronor, which the party estimates at 113 million kronor, and asylum seekers are to be able to study Swedish for immigrants (SFI). The party says no to stricter requirements for citizenship and for family reunification.
Climate and energy
The Green Party wants to introduce a Swedish system for emissions trading for road traffic and heating, designed like the EU's upcoming system, where the revenue is paid out to households. The party proposes a higher carbon price on petrol and that 4.05 billion kronor be paid out as a "green dividend" in rural areas. The aviation tax is to be reintroduced and doubled, and flights by private jet are to be taxed at 20,000 kronor, which according to the party yields 3.5 billion a year.
The party wants to build 10 gigawatts of renewable electricity with steady output by 2030 with 6 billion in investment support, and says no to the government's support for new nuclear power. In the long term the party wants to phase out nuclear power. A "Sweden card" for public transport is to cost 499 kronor a month and half that for young people, students and pensioners, at a cost of 11.1 billion. The railways get 18 billion more in investment and 6 billion more in maintenance, and low-income households in rural areas are to be able to lease an electric car.
Health and social care
The Green Party wants to give municipalities and regions 2.5 billion kronor in general government grants and 3 billion more for health care. The investment in women's health and maternity care is to be restored to 1.6 billion, and psychiatry is to get 500 million. Dental care is to be free of charge again up to age 23, and in the long term dental care is to be included in the high-cost protection like other care. The party wants to restore the high-cost protection for medicines to its previous level, strengthen primary care and defend LSS (the disability support act).
School
The Green Party wants to ban limited companies with a profit motive from running schools but keep free school choice, and for the state to take greater responsibility for school funding. The equivalence grant is to be raised by 1.5 billion kronor and preschool is to get 500 million. The free general preschool is to be expanded from 15 to 30 hours a week, with 20 hours as the first step. The party wants to raise the student grant by 300 kronor a month and says no to grades in the middle years of compulsory school.
The agencies' assessments, question by question.
This section sets out what government agencies and state councils have said about the party's proposals or about the same type of proposal, in the agency's own words or a close summary, both when they support and when they oppose. Parties that have been in government often receive more consultation responses, because their proposals have become inquiries and government bills, so a difference in quantity is not a judgement.
Economy and taxes
The Green Party wants the tax-free level for investment savings accounts to be 50,000 kronor instead of 300,000. In 2024 the National Institute of Economic Research (KI) advised against the proposal for a tax-free basic level and judged that a lower basic level could achieve the aim at lower cost, while the Swedish National Financial Management Authority (ESV) advised against the basic level altogether. On earned income tax credits as a type of proposal, the Fiscal Policy Council writes that further credits affect employment only marginally. The Climate Policy Council writes that the higher VAT on repairs of bicycles, shoes and clothing carries a signal value, even though the direct steering effect is small. We have not found any statement by a public authority on a tax on banks' net interest income.
- National Institute of Economic Research, consultation response on A tax-free basic level for savings in investment savings accounts and capital insurance (Fi2023/03235), 22 March 2024
- Swedish National Financial Management Authority, consultation response on A tax-free basic level for savings in investment savings accounts and capital insurance (Fi2023/03235), 19 March 2024
- Swedish Fiscal Policy Council, Swedish Fiscal Policy 2026, 16 February 2026
- Swedish Climate Policy Council, Report 2026 (report no. 9), 19 March 2026
Work
A special study published by the National Institute of Economic Research in December 2024, written by a researcher at Linnaeus University, concludes that research does not show any significant positive effects on employment from shorter working hours and that GDP per capita is expected to fall if working hours are shortened by law, which must be weighed against positive effects on health and leisure. The study judges that a reduction through collective agreements would have a more drawn-out and less clear effect on GDP. On the qualifying deduction for sick pay (karensavdrag), the Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate (ISF) wrote in 2025 that the deduction can reduce short-term absence but may contribute to longer absence among those who are on sick leave, and that the empirical evidence is limited. On the tapering of unemployment benefit, IFAU took no position in 2020, since in IFAU's view the state of research is unclear.
- National Institute of Economic Research, Special Study 112, Effects of shorter working hours on GDP, employment, productivity and health, 10 December 2024
- Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate, Report 2025:13, The importance of social insurance for individuals and society, section 3.3.2, 2025
- IFAU, consultation response on SOU 2020:37 A new set of rules for unemployment insurance, 30 October 2020
Crime and punishment
The party says children should not be in prison. On proposals in the opposite direction, a lower age of criminal responsibility, the Council on Legislation wrote on 12 March 2026 that the proposal cannot be considered compatible with the requirement in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child that deprivation of liberty of children be used only as a last resort and for the shortest appropriate time. Brå wrote in October 2025 that tougher penalties, reduced sentence reductions for young people and a lower age of criminal responsibility could together lead to many more children serving prison sentences. We have not found any statement by a public authority on the party's preventive proposals, such as an agency against segregation, the programme for people leaving gangs or a victims' rights act.
- Council on Legislation, opinion on Stricter rules for young offenders, 12 March 2026
- Brå, consultation response on SOU 2025:66 A penal reform, 9 October 2025
Migration and integration
On permanent residence permits, the Swedish Migration Agency wrote on 18 June 2025, in its consultation response on phasing them out, that temporary permits for resettled quota refugees would likely make integration harder and that the phase-out would bring more and more complex extension cases. At the same time the agency supported phasing out permanent permits for long-term residents. On change of status (spårbyte), the Swedish National Audit Office found on 25 October 2022 that the system on the whole reached the right target group but could be used to circumvent the rules for asylum and labour immigration, and recommended better controls. We have not found any agency statement on a higher daily allowance or SFI for asylum seekers.
- Swedish Migration Agency, consultation response on SOU 2025:31 Phasing out permanent residence permits, 18 June 2025
- Swedish National Audit Office, RiR 2022:21 Change of status in the migration process, controls and follow-up, 25 October 2022
Climate and energy
The Swedish Climate Policy Council notes in its report of 19 March 2026 that the government has abolished the aviation tax and counts this among the decisions that especially favour air travel. The Council writes that the EU's new emissions trading system ETS 2 for road transport and heating has been postponed to 2028 and that its effect on emissions will be limited in the short term. On state support for new nuclear power, the Council writes that practically all consultation bodies, including the Swedish Energy Agency, the Energy Markets Inspectorate and Svenska kraftnät, were critical, while it also welcomes investment in fossil-free electricity generation in the long term. Like the Swedish Energy Agency, the Council considers that new nuclear power will not be able to contribute in the medium term, around 2035, whereas wind power can account for a significant share of new supply. We have not found any agency statement on a national emissions trading system ahead of ETS 2.
Health and social care
On general rather than earmarked state grants: in the consultation responses on SOU 2025:62, Socialstyrelsen supported using earmarked grants only in exceptional cases, and Statskontoret wrote that earmarked grants give regions worse conditions for planning than general ones. On free dental care for young adults: in report 2021:4 the Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate (ISF) found that the share visiting dental care each year rose by 25.5 percentage points when the age limit was raised, most among those with poorer dental health or low household income. ISF also writes that it cannot determine how much of this is due to the care being free.
- National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), consultation response on SOU 2025:62, 21 October 2025
- Swedish Agency for Public Management (Statskontoret), consultation response on SOU 2025:62, 15 October 2025
- Swedish Social Insurance Inspectorate (ISF), Avgiftsfri tandvård till unga vuxna, report 2021:4
School
On the proposal type, restrictions on profit distribution in independent schools, the Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket), in its response of 25 June 2025 to the inquiry Stricter conditions for the independent school sector (SOU 2025:37), supports a ban on value transfers. That proposal is narrower than a ban on limited companies running schools and applies for five years from the first municipal grant. Skolverket judges that the rule would probably stop new independent schools from being established and could give larger established operators bigger market shares. On a larger state role in funding, Skolverket, in its response to SOU 2022:53, judges that greater state responsibility is necessary, but that greater state responsibility for resource allocation will not on its own solve the equity problems. We have not found any statement by a public authority on extending free universal preschool to 30 hours a week.
The research on the issues, with no verdict on the party.
Here are six questions about proposals the Green Party highlights, phrased as questions about the issue and not about the party. The answers describe what research has found, in both directions, and where researchers disagree. They say nothing about how a particular proposal would work today.
-
What happens when normal working hours are lowered?
When France lowered the working week from 40 to 39 hours in 1982, the risk of losing one's job rose slightly for those affected. Studies of the French 35-hour week have found no clear effect on employment, either upward or downward. Other studies from France and Portugal find that employees became more satisfied with their leisure time and their work. Researchers disagree about how much wage compensation and productivity determine the outcome, and the results do not transfer easily between countries.
Crépon and Kramarz (2002), Employed 40 Hours or Not Employed 39, Journal of Political Economy 110(6). Chemin and Wasmer (2009), Using Alsace-Moselle Local Laws to Build a Difference-in-Differences Estimation Strategy of the Employment Effects of the 35-Hour Workweek Regulation in France, Journal of Labor Economics 27(4). Lepinteur (2019), The shorter workweek and worker wellbeing, Labour Economics 58.
-
Do for-profit independent schools affect learning outcomes?
Swedish studies find that municipalities where more pupils attended independent schools got slightly better results for all pupils, mainly through competition and only after around ten years. Other studies that compare grades with externally marked tests find that independent schools gave more generous grades than the test results justified. In Chile, with a similar system, no improvement is seen on average but more sorting of pupils. Researchers disagree about whether grades or tests are the right measure and about whether the profit motive itself matters or only the competition.
Böhlmark and Lindahl (2015), Independent Schools and Long-run Educational Outcomes, Economica 82. Tyrefors Hinnerich and Vlachos (2017), The impact of upper-secondary voucher school attendance on student achievement, Labour Economics 47. Hsieh and Urquiola (2006), The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification, Journal of Public Economics 90.
-
Does a price on carbon reduce emissions, and is it accepted if the money is paid back?
The Swedish carbon tax reduced emissions from transport by around 11 percent compared with an estimated development without the tax. Research on acceptance shows that people worry a great deal about how the costs are distributed. Many prefer that the revenue goes to environmental measures rather than being paid out, so it is not a given that rebating makes the tax more accepted. Researchers disagree about how large the effect is in other countries and sectors and about which use of the money gives the most support.
Andersson (2019), Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11(4). Maestre-Andrés, Drews and van den Bergh (2019), Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature, Climate Policy 19(9).
-
Does cheaper public transport lead to fewer car trips?
When Tallinn made public transport free of charge in 2013, travel rose by around 14 percent, less than earlier studies had predicted, and mobility rose most among low-income households. The German 9-euro ticket in the summer of 2022 cut air pollution by more than 6 percent while it was in effect. Researchers disagree about whether the new travellers come from the car or from walking and cycling, whether the effect lasts, and whether a lower price gives more than a larger supply for the same money.
Cats, Susilo and Reimal (2017), The prospects of fare-free public transport: evidence from Tallinn, Transportation 44. Gohl and Schrauth (2024), Ticket to paradise? The effect of a public transport subsidy on air quality, Journal of Urban Economics.
-
Does sick leave rise if the sick-pay qualifying deduction is removed?
When the qualifying day was abolished in Sweden in 1987, total sick leave did not increase, but the number of sick days decreased. One explanation the researchers are testing is that fewer people went to work sick and became sick for longer. When Germany lowered sick pay from 100 to 80 percent in 1996, absence instead fell by around 5 percent. Researchers disagree about how short absences should be weighed against presenteeism and the spread of infection, and the effect may differ between occupations.
Pettersson-Lidbom and Skogman Thoursie (2013), Temporary Disability Insurance and Labor Supply: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115(2). Ziebarth and Karlsson (2010), A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs, Journal of Public Economics 94.
-
What does a higher child allowance do for children and parents?
In Canada, higher child benefits gave better test results for the children and better physical and mental health for the mothers. In Spain, a universal child benefit to new parents raised the number of births, but household consumption did not increase and the mothers stayed outside the labour market longer. Researchers disagree about how well targeted general benefits are compared with targeted support and how much they affect women's employment.
Milligan and Stabile (2011), Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-Being of Children?, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(3). González (2013), The Effect of a Universal Child Benefit on Conceptions, Abortions, and Early Maternal Labor Supply, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(3).
The issues on our theme pages.
- Climate and energy: emissions and electricity production over time.
- The electricity price: what determines the price and who decides.
- State budget: taxes, spending and the national debt.
- Work: employment and unemployment by municipality.
- The safety net: unemployment insurance, sickness insurance and child allowance.
- Crime: reported crimes, lethal violence and prevention.
- Population: immigration and emigration over time.
- Healthcare: waiting times and costs.
- Schools: results and grades by municipality.
The page reports what the Green Party itself writes in its party programme, its election manifesto and its budget motion, retrieved 27 October 2026. The research section describes the research on the issues, not the party.